[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0217bbaf-a831-8aea-3ecd-fa217fca1669@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 07:10:55 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au
Cc: christophe.leroy@....fr, mikey@...ling.org, apopple@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, npiggin@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org,
naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw_breakpoint: Fix build warnings with clang
Le 02/06/2020 à 06:12, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
> kbuild test robot reported few build warnings with hw_breakpoint code
> when compiled with clang[1]. Fix those.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/202005192233.oi9CjRtA%25lkp@intel.com/
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Note: Prepared on top of powerpc/next.
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 3 ---
> include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index f42a55eb77d2..cb424799da0d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -70,9 +70,6 @@ extern int hw_breakpoint_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *unused,
> unsigned long val, void *data);
> int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
> void arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
> -int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> -void arch_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> -void arch_unregister_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
> void hw_breakpoint_pmu_read(struct perf_event *bp);
> extern void flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(struct task_struct *tsk);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> index 6058c3844a76..521481f0d320 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ extern int dbg_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> extern int dbg_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> extern int reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> extern void release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> +extern int hw_breakpoint_weight(struct perf_event *bp);
> +extern int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> +extern void arch_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
> +extern void arch_unregister_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
Please no new 'extern'. In the old days 'extern' keyword was used, but
new code shall not introduce new unnecessary usage of 'extern' keyword.
See report from Checkpatch below:
WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description
(prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#9:
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/202005192233.oi9CjRtA%25lkp@intel.com/
CHECK:AVOID_EXTERNS: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
#40: FILE: include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h:83:
+extern int hw_breakpoint_weight(struct perf_event *bp);
CHECK:AVOID_EXTERNS: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
#41: FILE: include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h:84:
+extern int arch_reserve_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
CHECK:AVOID_EXTERNS: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
#42: FILE: include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h:85:
+extern void arch_release_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp);
CHECK:AVOID_EXTERNS: extern prototypes should be avoided in .h files
#43: FILE: include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h:86:
+extern void arch_unregister_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp);
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 4 checks, 19 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or
--fix-inplace.
the.patch has style problems, please review.
NOTE: Ignored message types: ARCH_INCLUDE_LINUX BIT_MACRO
COMPARISON_TO_NULL DT_SPLIT_BINDING_PATCH EMAIL_SUBJECT
FILE_PATH_CHANGES GLOBAL_INITIALISERS LINE_SPACING MULTIPLE_ASSIGNMENTS
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists