lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200602193048.6ab63e72@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:30:48 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:

  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c

between commit:

  b36e62eb8521 ("bpf: Use strncpy_from_unsafe_strict() in bpf_seq_printf() helper")

from the net-next tree and patch:

  "bpf:bpf_seq_printf(): handle potentially unsafe format string better"

from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (I just dropped the akpm tree patch (and its fix) for now)
and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ