linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 4/5] clk: qcom: Add ipq6018 apss clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4266555a-5e4f-4340-1b3c-487a70805751@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:17:20 +0530
From:   Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 4/5] clk: qcom: Add ipq6018 apss clock controller


On 6/2/2020 1:06 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sivaprakash Murugesan (2020-06-01 05:41:15)
>> On 5/28/2020 7:29 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Sivaprakash Murugesan (2020-05-27 05:24:51)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq6018.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq6018.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..004f7e1
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/apss-ipq6018.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
>>>> +       P_XO,
>>>> +       P_APSS_PLL_EARLY,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct clk_parent_data parents_apcs_alias0_clk_src[] = {
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "xo" },
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "pll" },
>>> This pll clk is not described in the binding. Please add it there.
>> Sorry I did not get this, this PLL is not directly defined in this
>> driver and it comes
>>
>> from dts. do you still want to describe it in binding?
>>
> Yes, there should be a clock-names property for "pll" and a clocks
> property in the binding document. I didn't see that.

These are defined in

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/658and

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/27/659

it has been defined as part of mailbox binding, since this driver does

not have a dts node and it is child of apcs mailbox driver.