linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vimc: debayer: Add support for ARGB format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <273a36d8-fc87-f9d4-0cf2-15beddf1661c@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:52:59 +0200
From:   Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
To:     Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
Cc:     Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com,
        dafna Hirschfeld <dafna3@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vimc: debayer: Add support for ARGB format



On 01.06.20 14:16, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 05:43:57PM +0200, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for the patch
>>
>> I don't know how real devices handle ARGB formats,
>> I wonder if it should be the part of the debayer.
> 
> Hi! qcam tries to support BA24 as it is one of the formats that vimc
> lists as its supported formats wih --list-formats. Shouldn't BA24 be
> possible to capture with vimc?

Hi,
Just to clarify, when listing the supported formats of a video node, the node lists
the formats that the video node as an independent media entity support.
It does not mean that the 'camera' as a whole (that is, the media topology graph) supports
all the formats that the video node lists. When interacting with a video node or
a subdevice node, one interacts only with that specific entity.
In the case of vimc, the RGB video node as an independent entity supports BA24 so the format
appears in the list of the its supported formats. But since the Debayer does not
support it, the format can not be generated by the entire vimc topology.
This is not a bug.

Hope t was helpful,
Dafna
  
> 
> If yes, which entity should support it, if not debayer? Should there be
> a separate conversion entity, or should we keep the support in debayer
> itself for efficiency issues?
> 
>>
>>
>> On 28.05.20 20:57, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
>>> Running qcam for pixelformat 0x34324142 showed that vimc debayer does
>>> not support it. Hence, add the support for Alpha (255).
>>
>> I would change the commit log to:
>>
>> Add support for V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24 format in the debayer
>> and set the alpha channel to constant 255.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dafna
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
>>> ---
>>>    .../media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-debayer.c    | 27 ++++++++++++-------
>>>    1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-debayer.c b/drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-debayer.c
>>> index c3f6fef34f68..f34148717a40 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-debayer.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/test-drivers/vimc/vimc-debayer.c
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static const u32 vimc_deb_src_mbus_codes[] = {
>>>    	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG,
>>>    	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_JEIDA,
>>>    	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X32_PADHI,
>>> +	MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ARGB8888_1X32
>>>    };
>>>    static const struct vimc_deb_pix_map vimc_deb_pix_map_list[] = {
>>> @@ -322,15 +323,23 @@ static void vimc_deb_process_rgb_frame(struct vimc_deb_device *vdeb,
>>>    	unsigned int i, index;
>>>    	vpix = vimc_pix_map_by_code(vdeb->src_code);
>>> -	index = VIMC_FRAME_INDEX(lin, col, vdeb->sink_fmt.width, 3);
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>>> -		switch (vpix->pixelformat) {
>>> -		case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24:
>>> -			vdeb->src_frame[index + i] = rgb[i];
>>> -			break;
>>> -		case V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24:
>>> -			vdeb->src_frame[index + i] = rgb[2 - i];
>>> -			break;
>>> +
>>> +	if (vpix->pixelformat == V4L2_PIX_FMT_ARGB32) {
>>> +		index =  VIMC_FRAME_INDEX(lin, col, vdeb->sink_fmt.width, 4);
>>> +		vdeb->src_frame[index] = 255;
>>> +		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
>>> +			vdeb->src_frame[index + i + 1] = rgb[i];
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		index =  VIMC_FRAME_INDEX(lin, col, vdeb->sink_fmt.width, 3);
>>> +		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>>> +			switch (vpix->pixelformat) {
>>> +			case V4L2_PIX_FMT_RGB24:
>>> +				vdeb->src_frame[index + i] = rgb[i];
>>> +				break;
>>> +			case V4L2_PIX_FMT_BGR24:
>>> +				vdeb->src_frame[index + i] = rgb[2 - i];
>>> +				break;
>>> +			}
>>>    		}
>>>    	}
>>>    }
>>>