linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200601194936.244303d858d2d0c47fc87821@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 1 Jun 2020 19:49:36 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
        ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh: remove sh5 support

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 21:33:32 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:

> Hmm, it looks like Andrew Morton just pulled most of these into -mm,
> apparently independently of me getting them in my for-next a few hours
> ago, since his versions lack my signed-off-by. That's ok though, as
> long as they go up. Some details since further action is needed on a
> few:

It would be better if these were to go via the sh tree.  So please go
ahead and merge them up - I'll drop my copies when they turn up in
-next via the sh tree.