linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 06/16] KVM: Use GUP instead of copy_from/to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200602133309.xyet6tndjadwafnb@box>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:33:09 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        "Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 06/16] KVM: Use GUP instead of copy_from/to_user() to
 access guest memory

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:35:22PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 25/05/20 17:17, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> Personally, I would've just added 'struct kvm' pointer to 'struct
> >> kvm_memory_slot' to be able to extract 'mem_protected' info when
> >> needed. This will make the patch much smaller.
> > Okay, can do.
> > 
> > Other thing I tried is to have per-slot flag to indicate that it's
> > protected. But Sean pointed that it's all-or-nothing feature and having
> > the flag in the slot would be misleading.
> > 
> 
> Perhaps it would be misleading, but it's an optimization.  Saving a
> pointer dereference can be worth it, also because there are some places
> where we just pass around a memslot and we don't have the struct kvm*.

Vitaly proposed to add struct kvm pointer into memslot. Do you object
against it?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov