[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTTRKWP47Y4bXmXpPdG-ay4Je2+HUOaMOMz37qDxZSiu6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:08:14 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] riscv: Add vector ISA support
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:21 AM Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com> wrote:
>
> Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> 於 2020年5月31日 週日 下午11:52寫道:
> >
> > Hi Greentime & Vincent,
> >
> > Thx for the dynamic vlen implementation. I've two suggestions:
> > - Please give out glibc patches mail URL, we need to review them together.
> > - We need to consider that not all processes need vectors. Most
> > system processes do not have vector features, and we should not force
> > save/restore vector for every process.
> >
>
> Hi Guo,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch. We are still cooking the glibc patch,
> we will add the glibc link address once we post it.
> For the save/restore mechanism in signal, it is basically the same
> with FPU porting, we can optimize it when setup_sigcontext() for both
> FPU and VECTOR in the future.
>
> /* Save the floating-point state. */
> if (has_fpu)
> err |= save_fp_state(regs, &sc->sc_fpregs);
> /* Save the vector state. */
> if (has_vector)
> err |= save_v_state(regs, sc);
>
> There should be a better way to detect whether this task use
> fpu/vector or not. Might be elf attributes or something else.
Ok, we could improve it in future patches.
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists