lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:05:18 +0200 From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>, Stephen McCamant <smccaman@....edu>, Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>, Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure >> I find this commit message improvable also according to Linux software >> development documentation. > > Causing people to send out new versions of things for tweaks to the > commit log consumes time for them and everyone they're sending changes to. Improving patches (besides source code adjustments) is an usual software development activity, isn't it? > Pushing people to make trivial rewordings of their commit logs to > match your particular taste is not a good use of people's time. Corresponding tweaks can be combined with recommended tags. It can be that only “trivial” items were left over for another bit of fine-tuning. Subsequent description variants can reduce the probability for additional patch review iterations, can't they? Regards, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists