linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:02:00 +0100
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <shuah@...nel.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
        <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>, <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review


On 02/06/2020 16:37, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 6/2/20 3:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.226 release.
>> There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:16:52 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
> 
> Many arm builds still fail as attached. Is it really only me seeing this problem ?

No I am seeing this as well. Been having some email problems today ...

> FWIW, if we need/want to use unified assembler in v4.9.y, shouldn't all unified
> assembler patches be applied ?
> 
> $ git log --oneline v4.9..c001899a5d6 arch/arm | grep unified
> c001899a5d6c ARM: 8843/1: use unified assembler in headers

Bisect points to this one for me.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic