[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200602161350.GH31548@mtj.thefacebook.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:13:50 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: ensure all flush_work() completed when being
destoryed
Hello, Lai.
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:49:14PM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> +static void dec_nr_in_flight_flush_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
> +{
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&wq->nr_flush_work))
Do you think it'd make sense to put this in pwq so that it can be
synchronized with the pool lock instead of using a separate atomic counter?
Makes sense to me otherwise.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists