[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VHGm8EhsLOw_XTNRy6b-AKXgpwwGKE4kAm0-x4XT0ovg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 20:39:02 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: amasule@...eaurora.org, stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Jeffrey Kardatzke <jkardatzke@...gle.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
vgarodia@...eaurora.org,
Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] media: venus: Fix NULL pointer dereference in core selection
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:03 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> The newly-introduced function min_loaded_core() iterates over all of
> the venus instances an tries to figure out how much load each instance
> is putting on each core. Not all instances, however, might be fully
> initialized. Specifically the "codec_freq_data" is initialized as
> part of vdec_queue_setup(), but an instance may already be in the list
> of all instances before that time.
>
> Let's band-aid this by checking to see if codec_freq_data is NULL
> before dereferencing.
>
> NOTE: without this fix I was running into a crash. Specifically there
> were two venus instances. One was doing start_streaming. The other
> was midway through queue_setup but hadn't yet gotten to initting
> "codec_freq_data".
>
> Fixes: eff82f79c562 ("media: venus: introduce core selection")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> I'm not massively happy about this commit but it's the best I could
> come up with without being much more of an expert in the venus codec.
> If someone has a better patch then please just consider this one to be
> a bug report and feel free to submit a better fix! :-)
>
> In general I wonder a little bit about whether it's safe to be peeking
> at all the instances without grabbing the "inst->lock" on each one. I
> guess it is since we do it both here and in load_scale_v4() but I
> don't know why.
>
> One thought I had was that we could fully avoid accessing the other
> instances, at least in min_loaded_core(), by just keeping track of
> "core1_load" and "core2_load" in "struct venus_core". Whenever we add
> a new instance we could add to the relevant variables and whenever we
> release an instance we could remove. Such a change seems cleaner but
> would require someone to test to make sure we didn't miss any case
> (AKA we always properly added/removed our load from the globals).
>
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/pm_helpers.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
This fixes the same crash as the patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/1588314480-22409-1-git-send-email-mansur@codeaurora.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists