[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXtsvewiN3bmfJqwuURN--aCkaR7N6zfYWf82KmFUZnLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:04:55 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: genetlink: Fix memleak in genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit()
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:47 PM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
> @@ -630,6 +625,9 @@ static int genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit(const struct genl_family *family,
> err = __netlink_dump_start(net->genl_sock, skb, nlh, &c);
> }
>
> + genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_free(info->family, info->attrs, true);
> + genl_dumpit_info_free(info);
> +
> return err;
> }
I do not think you can just move it after __netlink_dump_start(),
because cb->done() can be called, for example, in netlink_sock_destruct()
too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists