[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200603135736.e7b5ded0082a81ae6d9067a0@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:57:36 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/{mips,sparc,microblaze,powerpc}: Don't enable
pagefault/preempt twice
On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for
> > > sparc 32 bit...
> > >
> > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch?
> > >
> > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions
> > >
> >
> > That is not easy to revert, unfortunately, due to several follow-up patches.
>
> I have gotten your sparc tests to run and they all pass...
>
> 08:10:34 > ../linux-build-test/rootfs/sparc/run-qemu-sparc.sh
> Build reference: v5.7-rc4-17-g852b6f2edc0f
>
> Building sparc32:SPARCClassic:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SPARCbook:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:LX:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-4:nosmp:initrd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-5:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-10:nosmp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-20:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-600MP:nosmp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:Voyager:nosmp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-4:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-5:smp:scsi:cd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-10:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-20:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:SS-600MP:smp:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
> Building sparc32:Voyager:smp:noapc:scsi:hd ... running ......... passed
>
> Is there another test I need to run?
This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might
have issues on various architectures.
Can folks please provide an update on the testing status?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists