[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvzZequ2JtzaVOxSst_sH7PPWpWVF5nHv=B8oxLpy=wDjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 09:03:42 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To: Zhe Li <lizhe67@...wei.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] jffs2: fix jffs2 mounting failure
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:58 AM Zhe Li <lizhe67@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Mounting jffs2 on nand flash will get message "failed: I/O error"
> with the steps listed below.
> 1.erase nand flash
> 2.mount jffs2 on it (this mounting operation will be successful)
> 3.do chown or chmod to the mount point directory
> 4.umount jffs2
> 5.mount jffs2 on nand flash
> After step 5, we will get message "mount ... failed: I/O error".
The important step is missing. You need to unmount before jffs2 is done
with erasing.
> if (c->nr_erasing_blocks) {
> - if ( !c->used_size && ((c->nr_free_blocks+empty_blocks+bad_blocks)!= c->nr_blocks || bad_blocks == c->nr_blocks) ) {
> + if (!c->used_size && ((c->nr_free_blocks+empty_blocks+bad_blocks) != c->nr_blocks || bad_blocks == c->nr_blocks) &&
> + !(has_root_inode(c) && !has_other_inode(c))) {
I see the problem but I don't think it is wise to implement such a workaround.
IIUC the real issue is that c->used_size being zero but
c->nr_free_blocks+empty_blocks+bad_blocks does not sum
up correctly in this situation.
--
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists