[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1591168935-6382-4-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:52:14 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: daniel.thompson@...aro.org
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, jason.wessel@...driver.com,
dianders@...omium.org, pmladek@...e.com,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jslaby@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] kdb: Make kdb_printf() console handling more robust
While rounding up CPUs via NMIs, its possible that a rounded up CPU
maybe holding a console port lock leading to kgdb master CPU stuck in
a deadlock during invocation of console write operations. A similar
deadlock could also be possible while using synchronous breakpoints.
So in order to avoid such a deadlock, set oops_in_progress to encourage
the console drivers to disregard their internal spin locks: in the
current calling context the risk of deadlock is a bigger problem than
risks due to re-entering the console driver. We operate directly on
oops_in_progress rather than using bust_spinlocks() because the calls
bust_spinlocks() makes on exit are not appropriate for this calling
context.
Suggested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
---
kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c
index 58b7d25..0e4f2ed 100644
--- a/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c
+++ b/kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c
@@ -562,7 +562,18 @@ static void kdb_msg_write(const char *msg, int msg_len)
for_each_console(c) {
if (!(c->flags & CON_ENABLED))
continue;
+ /*
+ * Set oops_in_progress to encourage the console drivers to
+ * disregard their internal spin locks: in the current calling
+ * context the risk of deadlock is a bigger problem than risks
+ * due to re-entering the console driver. We operate directly on
+ * oops_in_progress rather than using bust_spinlocks() because
+ * the calls bust_spinlocks() makes on exit are not appropriate
+ * for this calling context.
+ */
+ ++oops_in_progress;
c->write(c, msg, msg_len);
+ --oops_in_progress;
touch_nmi_watchdog();
}
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists