lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200603081124.1627600-1-matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Date:   Wed,  3 Jun 2020 10:11:23 +0200
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Ferenc Fejes <fejes@....elte.hu>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix unused-var without NETDEVICES

A recent commit added new variables only used if CONFIG_NETDEVICES is
set. A simple fix is to only declare these variables if the same
condition is valid.

Other solutions could be to move the code related to SO_BINDTODEVICE
option from _bpf_setsockopt() function to a dedicated one or only
declare these variables in the related "case" section.

Fixes: 70c58997c1e8 ("bpf: Allow SO_BINDTODEVICE opt in bpf_setsockopt")
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
---

Notes:
    This fix currently applies on net-next and bpf-next only. Except that
    net-next is now closed and -net will get commits from net-next after
    Linus' pull.
    
    I hope it is fine to have picked [PATCH bpf] and not bpf-next (or net).

 net/core/filter.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index d01a244b5087..ee08c6fcee1a 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4286,9 +4286,11 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_socket_uid_proto = {
 static int _bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 			   char *optval, int optlen, u32 flags)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETDEVICES
 	char devname[IFNAMSIZ];
 	struct net *net;
 	int ifindex;
+#endif
 	int ret = 0;
 	int val;
 
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ