linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] crash: add VMCOREINFO macro for anonymous structs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 12:16:28 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] crash: add VMCOREINFO macro for anonymous structs

On Fri 2020-05-01 11:46:08, John Ogness wrote:
> Some structs are not named and are only available via their typedef.
> Add a VMCOREINFO macro to export field offsets for such structs.

Honestly, I did not get the meaning until I looked at the sample
usage added by the 2nd patch.

The term "anonymous structures" has another meaning in C++. It is
used for structures without any name that are defined inside a named
structure.

Something like this might be better:

"crash: Add VMCOREINFO macro to define offset in a struct declared by typedef

 The existing macro VMCOREINFO_OFFSET() can't be used for structures
 declared via typedef because "struct" is not part of type definition.

 Create another macro for this purpose."

Anyway, thanks a lot for the prototype of crash implementation.
I am happy that it is possible.

Best Regards,
Petr

PS: It might take few more days until I send some feedback for the
other patches. They are a bit more complex ;-)