lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a9ecd617-c541-aeb1-2e94-93abba475279@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:57:39 +0800
From:   "wanghai (M)" <wanghai38@...wei.com>
To:     Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>, <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <arnd@...db.de>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <imunsie@....ibm.com>,
        <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: Fix kobject memleak


在 2020/6/3 19:33, Andrew Donnellan 写道:
> On 2/6/20 10:07 pm, Wang Hai wrote:
>> Currently the error return path from kobject_init_and_add() is not
>> followed by a call to kobject_put() - which means we are leaking
>> the kobject.
>>
>> Fix it by adding a call to kobject_put() in the error path of
>> kobject_init_and_add().
>>
>> Fixes: b087e6190ddc ("cxl: Export optional AFU configuration record 
>> in sysfs")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
>
> Thanks for the fix!
>
> I note that the err1 label returns without calling kfree(cr) and I 
> can't see a reason why we do that - so perhaps we should remove the 
> return statement in err1: so it falls through?
>
kfree(cr) can be called when 
kobject_put()-->kobject_release()-->kobject_cleanup()-->kobj_type->release() 
is called.  The kobj_type here is afu_config_record_type


Thanks,

Wang Hai


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ