[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd640661-143f-882f-ed92-3d2791b173aa@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:09:21 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, amit@...nel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, brendan.d.gregg@...il.com,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, cai@....pw, colin.king@...onical.com,
corbet@....net, dwmw@...zon.com, foersleo@...zon.de,
irogers@...gle.com, jolsa@...hat.com, kirill@...temov.name,
mark.rutland@....com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
rdunlap@...radead.org, riel@...riel.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, sblbir@...zon.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
shuah@...nel.org, sj38.park@...il.com, snu@...zon.de,
vbabka@...e.cz, vdavydov.dev@...il.com, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
ying.huang@...el.com, linux-damon@...zon.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 7/9] mm/damon: Implement callbacks for physical memory
monitoring
On 03.06.20 16:11, SeongJae Park wrote:
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
>
> This commit implements the four callbacks (->init_target_regions,
> ->update_target_regions, ->prepare_access_check, and ->check_accesses)
> for the basic access monitoring of the physical memory address space.
> By setting the callback pointers to point those, users can easily
> monitor the accesses to the physical memory.
>
> Internally, it uses the PTE Accessed bit, as similar to that of the
> virtual memory support. Also, it supports only page frames that
> supported by idle page tracking. Acutally, most of the code is stollen
> from idle page tracking. Users who want to use other access check
> primitives and monitor the frames that not supported with this
> implementation could implement their own callbacks on their own.
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> ---
> include/linux/damon.h | 5 ++
> mm/damon.c | 184 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 189 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h
> index 1a788bfd1b4e..f96503a532ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/damon.h
> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,11 @@ void kdamond_update_vm_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> void kdamond_prepare_vm_access_checks(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> unsigned int kdamond_check_vm_accesses(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
>
> +void kdamond_init_phys_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> +void kdamond_update_phys_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> +void kdamond_prepare_phys_access_checks(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> +unsigned int kdamond_check_phys_accesses(struct damon_ctx *ctx);
> +
> int damon_set_pids(struct damon_ctx *ctx, int *pids, ssize_t nr_pids);
> int damon_set_attrs(struct damon_ctx *ctx, unsigned long sample_int,
> unsigned long aggr_int, unsigned long regions_update_int,
> diff --git a/mm/damon.c b/mm/damon.c
> index f5cbc97a3bbc..6a5c6d540580 100644
> --- a/mm/damon.c
> +++ b/mm/damon.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,9 @@
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/page_idle.h>
> +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> +#include <linux/rmap.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/sched/task.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -480,6 +482,11 @@ void kdamond_init_vm_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Do nothing. Users should set the initial regions by themselves */
> +void kdamond_init_phys_regions(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +}
> +
> static void damon_mkold(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
> {
> pte_t *pte = NULL;
> @@ -611,6 +618,178 @@ unsigned int kdamond_check_vm_accesses(struct damon_ctx *ctx)
> return max_nr_accesses;
> }
>
> +/* access check functions for physical address based regions */
> +
> +/* This code is stollen from page_idle.c */
> +static struct page *damon_phys_get_page(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> + pg_data_t *pgdat;
> +
> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> + return NULL;
> +
Who provides these pfns? Can these be random pfns, supplied unchecked by
user space? Or are they at least mapped into some user space process?
IOW, do we need a pfn_to_online_page() to make sure the memmap even was
initialized?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists