linux-kernel - Re: [GIT pull] timers/core for v5.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiQr=wMrjpDXfvR=g+muNr4ST6=4O_jv6pOuTbtdbE_aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:16:51 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] timers/core for v5.8

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 5:09 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> The truly boring timer and clocksource updates for 5.8:
>
>  - Not a single new clocksource or clockevent driver!

The diffstat proved that to be a filthy lie:

>  drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm-systimer.c         | 727 +++++++++++++++++++++

comes from

> Tony Lindgren (6):
>       clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Add clockevent and clocksource support

Ok, ok, it's "based on existing arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c". So I
guess you considered it one of the device tree cleanups.

But I'm not fooled by your transparent little white lies.  We will
never ever have a release without new clocksource drivers.

Sob.

                 Linus