linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: api: add kzfree script

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:03:40 +0300
From:   Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v2] coccinelle: api: add kzfree script

On 6/4/20 11:57 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On the other hand, do you really require E to be a pointer?  If you do
> that, it will have to find the type of E.  If E refers to a structure
> field, then the type might not be available in the current function, and
> you may need command line argments like --all-includes or
> --recursive-includes.  Is avoiding transforming the case where E is not
> verified to be a pointer a concern?

It's save to use "expression E;" in this rule. Do you want me to send v3?

Any thoughts about commented lines in "patch"? Maybe I do something wrong
trying to use "..." it in r2?

Thanks,
Denis