[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjm+RrcTjB7KYCCsOouE2EyzRcwWUE9TVq6OCYYAt9Zyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:12:14 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: track which page-table levels were modified
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:06 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> As discussed over in
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200604164814.GA7600@kernel.org/,
> Mike's "mm: remove __ARCH_HAS_5LEVEL_HACK" patchset
> (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200414153455.21744-1-rppt@kernel.org) is
> expected to fix this. 5level-fixup.h gets removed.
Ok, even better.
That said, the commentary about "why is p.._alloc_track() in such a
core header file, when it's only used by two special cases" is
probably still true regardless of the 5-level fixup header.. I assume
Mike didn't do those kinds of changes?
Yeah, I'm probably flailing at windmills, but I do dislike how we
often end up just growing the very core headers that get included by
everybody without ever trying to fix that uncontrolled growth..
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists