linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL for v5.8-rc1] media updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200604082052.298d534f@coco.lan>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:20:52 +0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL for v5.8-rc1] media updates

Em Wed, 3 Jun 2020 21:21:06 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> escreveu:

> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:06 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >   - The atomisp staging driver was resurrected. It is meant to work with
> >     4 generations of cameras on Atom-based laptops, tablets and cell
> >     phones. So, it seems worth investing time to cleanup this driver and
> >     making it in good shape.  
> 
> Hmm. It causes a warning for me:
> 
>    drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_v4l2.c:764:12: warning:
> ‘atomisp_mrfld_power’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> 
> which is a bit annoying.
> 
> I can see the FIXME's there, but the warning still isn't acceptable.
> 
> I'll add a fixup commit. I was going to do it in the merge itself, but
> decided that was a bit too subtle.

OK!

I have a patch like that already on a separate pile of patches,
which address several other things. I opted to place them in
separate, in order to give people some time to comment and review.

My plan is to keep them on linux-next and submit you next week, if
ok for you.

The new series should drop all LLVM warnings and add SPDX headers,
among other things. 

Thanks,
Mauro