[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUU4Re5g3rRJ=WF3_KiCEc3CUmbH_PibTunuK_E1QskEjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 09:26:58 +0200
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, x86@...nel.org,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove uninitialized_var() macro
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:33 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:31:53PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> > (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
> > (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
> > either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.
> >
> > As recommended[2] by[3] Linus[4], remove the macro.
> >
> > Most of the 300 uses don't cause any warnings on gcc 9.3.0, so they're in
> > a single treewide commit in this series. A few others needed to actually
> > get cleaned up, and I broke those out into individual patches.
> >
> > -Kees
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/
> > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Kees Cook (10):
> > x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > drbd: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > b43: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > rtlwifi: rtl8192cu: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > ide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > clk: st: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > spi: davinci: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > checkpatch: Remove awareness of uninitialized_var() macro
> > treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage
> > compiler: Remove uninitialized_var() macro
>
> I applied all of these on top of cb8e59cc8720 and ran a variety of
> builds with clang for arm32, arm64, mips, powerpc, s390, and x86_64 [1]
> and only saw one warning pop up (which was about a variable being
> unused, commented on patch 9 about it). No warnings about uninitialized
> variables came up; clang's -Wuninitialized was not impacted by
> 78a5255ffb6a ("Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized") so it
> should have caught anything egregious.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/nathanchance/llvm-kernel-testing
>
> For the series, consider it:
>
> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> [build]
>
Hi Kees,
I tried with updated version (checkpatch) of your tree and see no
(new) warnings in my build-log.
Feel free to add my...
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Thanks.
Regards,
- Sedat -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists