linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:26:06 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus'
 tree

Hi David,

On Mon, 1 Jun 2020 20:30:34 -0600 David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/1/20 5:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > On Mon, 11 May 2020 13:00:15 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:  
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the ipsec-next tree got conflicts in:
> >>
> >>   net/ipv4/xfrm4_output.c
> >>   net/ipv6/xfrm6_output.c
> >>
> >> between commit:
> >>
> >>   0c922a4850eb ("xfrm: Always set XFRM_TRANSFORMED in xfrm{4,6}_output_finish")
> >>
> >> from Linus' tree and commit:
> >>
> >>   2ab6096db2f1 ("xfrm: remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo")
> >>
> >> from the ipsec-next tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (I used the latter versions of these files and then added
> >> the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed
> >> as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should
> >> be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for
> >> merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer
> >> of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> >>
> >> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> >> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:57:24 +1000
> >> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: merge fixup for "remove output_finish indirection from xfrm_state_afinfo"
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> >> ---
> >>  net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 4 ----
> >>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> >> index 886a9b284b3a..0f4b3a5e02ba 100644
> >> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> >> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> >> @@ -574,16 +574,12 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >>  	switch (x->outer_mode.family) {
> >>  	case AF_INET:
> >>  		memset(IPCB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(skb)));
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> >>  		IPCB(skb)->flags |= IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> >> -#endif
> >>  		break;
> >>  	case AF_INET6:
> >>  		memset(IP6CB(skb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(skb)));
> >>  
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER
> >>  		IP6CB(skb)->flags |= IP6SKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED;
> >> -#endif
> >>  		break;
> >>  	}
> >>    
> > 
> > It looks like this merge resolution fix up was missed when the
> > ipsec-next tree was merged into the net-next tree.
> >   
> 
> Thanks for catching that, Stephen. Important fix in 0c922a4850eb.
> 

And now the net-next tree has been merged into Linus' tree without this fix :-(

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped