linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis_spi: Don't send anything during flow control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200604094012.GA8989@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 12:40:12 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Andrey Pronin <apronin@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis_spi: Don't send anything during flow control

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:54:03PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Does that answer your question, or were you worried about us needing
> to init iobuf[0] to 0 in some other case?
> 
> -Doug

No, but it should be treated as a bug fix for CR50 implementation i.e.
for 797c0113c9a481d4554988d70b5b52fae657262f, or is there some reason
why it shouldn't?

/Jarkko