lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:04:08 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: split character device into gpiolib-cdev

wt., 2 cze 2020 o 16:11 Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> napisaƂ(a):
>
> Split the cdev specific functionality out of gpiolib.c and into
> gpiolib-cdev.c. This improves the readability and maintainability of both
> the cdev and core gpiolib code.
>
> Suggested-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
>
> ---
> While this patch is complete and ready for review, I don't expect it to
> be applied as is. There are a few cdev patches pending merge into
> gpio/devel that are sure to conflict, and it makes more sense to
> rebase this on top of them than vice versa. But I thought it would
> be worthwhile to get it out for review so it can be ready to be rebased
> when the time is right.
>
> Also, this is a naive split. That is, if applied as is, it will lose the
> line history of the cdev code.  This is not what I intend, and I
> understand can be avoided by encouraging git to remember the history
> with a few moves, but I'm unsure how the maintainers would prefer that
> to be done.
>
> Bart,
>  As this was your idea, I've taken the liberty of adding the Suggested-by.
>  I hope that is ok.
>
> Changes in v2:
>  - rebased to latest gpio/devel and added base-commit to placate the
>   build bot.  The comments above still apply, as there are still a
>   couple of commits in gpio/fixes that will conflict.
>
> Kent.

Thanks for doing this Kent!

This looks mostly good, see a single comment below.

Linus: do you think we can get this in for v5.8? Maybe apply this as
the last patch before your PR?

>
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile       |    1 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 1148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.h |   11 +
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 1112 +--------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 1164 insertions(+), 1108 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> index 65bf3940e33c..b5b58b624f37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)           += gpiolib.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)          += gpiolib-devres.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)          += gpiolib-legacy.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)          += gpiolib-devprop.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)          += gpiolib-cdev.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)          += gpiolib-of.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS)       += gpiolib-sysfs.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_GPIO_ACPI)                += gpiolib-acpi.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..971470bdc9c9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1148 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irqreturn.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/cdev.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
> +#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
> +#include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/kfifo.h>
> +#include <linux/poll.h>
> +#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/gpio.h>
> +
> +
> +#include "gpiolib.h"
> +
> +/* Implementation infrastructure for GPIO interfaces.
> + *
> + * The GPIO programming interface allows for inlining speed-critical
> + * get/set operations for common cases, so that access to SOC-integrated
> + * GPIOs can sometimes cost only an instruction or two per bit.
> + */

Is this comment relevant for the character device?

Bartosz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ