lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200604132306.GO6578@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 10:23:06 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 04:32:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1]
> (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings
> (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized,
> either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes.
> 
> I preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining
> needless uses with the following script:
> 
> git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \
> 	xargs perl -pi -e \
> 		's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g;
> 		 s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;'
> 
> drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid
> pathological white-space.
> 
> No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0
> for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64,
> alpha, and m68k.

At least in the infiniband part I'm confident that old gcc versions
will print warnings after this patch.

As the warnings are wrong, do we care? Should old gcc maybe just -Wno-
the warning?

Otherwise the IB bits look ok to me

Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ