[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0e5110b-3eba-e212-5299-d68585c9730c@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:38:32 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix a typo in comment
On 04.06.20 20:52, Jeongtae Park wrote:
> There is a typo in comment, fix it.
> "nother" -> "another"
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@...sung.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 1e94497b7388..3091c2ca60df 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ static inline void __vfree_deferred(const void *addr)
> * Use raw_cpu_ptr() because this can be called from preemptible
> * context. Preemption is absolutely fine here, because the llist_add()
> * implementation is lockless, so it works even if we are adding to
> - * nother cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
> + * another cpu's list. schedule_work() should be fine with this too.
> */
> struct vfree_deferred *p = raw_cpu_ptr(&vfree_deferred);
>
>
fwiw
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists