linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] selftests/ftrace: Add "requires:" list support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 00:08:50 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] selftests/ftrace: Add "requires:" list support

Hi Steve,

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:33:43 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 08:51:13 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 09:21:45 -0400
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue,  2 Jun 2020 18:08:31 +0900
> > > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/template
> > > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > > >  #!/bin/sh
> > > >  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > >  # description: %HERE DESCRIBE WHAT THIS DOES%
> > > > +# requires: %HERE LIST UP REQUIRED FILES%  
> > > 
> > > Not sure what you mean by "LIST UP". Perhaps you mean "LIST OF"?  
> > 
> > Ah, perhups we don't need UP. "list the required files" will be OK?
> > 
> >
> 
> Yes, that sounds much better.
> 
> I tested out the patches with a few different configurations, and they all
> look good.
> 
> Although I found that the irqsoff_tracer.tc (test for the preemptirqsoff
> tracer) changed from UNRESOLVED to UNSUPPORTED.

Yes, I think it should be unsupported if the kernel doesn't configure the
feature.

> 
> I'll run a few more different configs and see what happens, but you can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

Thanks, and I've already sent v3.

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/159115200085.70027.6141550347953439240.stgit@devnote2


Thank you,


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>