lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:30:27 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>, Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 42/75] x86/sev-es: Setup GHCB based boot #VC handler On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:07:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for > them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I > still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols > are? Hmmkay, I see vc_no_ghcb doing call do_vc_no_ghcb and that's setup in early_idt_setup(). vc_boot_ghcb(), OTOH, is called by do_early_exception() only so that one could be called handle_vc_boot_ghcb(), no? I.e., I don't see it being an IDT entry point. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists