linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: split character device into gpiolib-cdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXyVO4unLQOzC0xf47CTmK6VurTk+Q=9RDWhcP0pu73pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:22:43 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpiolib: split character device into gpiolib-cdev

czw., 4 cze 2020 o 16:18 Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> napisał(a):
>
> >
> > Is this comment relevant for the character device?
> >
>
> True - that comment should stay in gpiolib, and gpiolib-cdev should get
> one of it's own.
>
> Any suggestions on how to maintain line history?
> I know you can trick git by moving the original file into two new ones,
> then moving one of those back to the old name, but not sure if that is
> what you would want to see in a patch.
>

People don't seem to care much about this in the kernel. Files get
moved and git blame results get lost all the time. Don't stress about
it.

Bart