linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for Linux 5.8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8ffbd4d8-5baf-c2ee-8728-cc73794ed863@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 18:33:33 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First batch of KVM changes for Linux 5.8

On 04/06/20 00:17, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:39 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>> There could be minor conflicts depending on the order you're processing 5.8
>> pull requests.
> It would have been good if you had actually pointed to the reports
> from linux-next.
> 
> As it was, the hyper-v pull request did do that (thanks Wei Liu), so I
> could verify my merge against what had been reported and this didn't
> take me by surprise, but it would have good to see that kind of detail
> from the kvm pull too..

Ok, I'll keep it in mind.  Based on today's report from Stephen, you
will get also a conflict with the s390 tree, and a semantic change
(build failure) when Thomas sends his large IRQ rework, due to the
removal of the second argument to do_machine_check.

Paolo