[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <673d2612-53d2-4f86-1b88-dd9d8d974307@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:56:38 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Interrupt-based mechanism for async_pf
'page present' notifications
On 04/06/20 19:45, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> I'll do another round of review and queue patches 1-7; 8-9 will be
>> queued later and separately due to the conflicts with the interrupt
>> entry rework, but it's my job and you don't need to do anything else.
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I seee 1-7 got merged for 5.8. When you say patch 8-9 will be queue later,
> you mean later in 5.8 or it will held till 5.9 merge window opens.
I hope to get them in 5.8. They have some pretty nasty conflicts that
are too much for Linus to resolve. So my plan is to put 8-9 in a topic
branch and do the merge myself. Whether this works out depends on the
timing of the tip pull request.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists