linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Interrupt-based mechanism for async

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:56:38 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: x86: Interrupt-based mechanism for async_pf
 'page present' notifications

On 04/06/20 19:45, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> I'll do another round of review and queue patches 1-7; 8-9 will be
>> queued later and separately due to the conflicts with the interrupt
>> entry rework, but it's my job and you don't need to do anything else.
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> I seee 1-7 got merged for 5.8. When you say patch 8-9 will be queue later,
> you mean later in 5.8 or it will held till 5.9 merge window opens.

I hope to get them in 5.8.  They have some pretty nasty conflicts that
are too much for Linus to resolve.  So my plan is to put 8-9 in a topic
branch and do the merge myself.  Whether this works out depends on the
timing of the tip pull request.

Paolo