linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] perf x86: Exposing IO stack to IO PMON mapping through sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200605203924.GH691017@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:39:24 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        eranian@...gle.com, bgregg@...flix.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
        lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] perf x86: Exposing IO stack to IO PMON mapping
 through sysfs

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 07:53:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 11:35:40AM +0300, alexander.antonov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> 
> Didn't GregKH have comments on earlier versions of these patches? I
> don't see him on Cc anymore. Were all his comments addressed?

I believe Greg's comments were addressed.

-Andi