linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 kunit-next 0/2] kunit: extend kunit resources API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:20:35 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 kunit-next 0/2] kunit: extend kunit resources API

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:46 PM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> A recent RFC patch set [1] suggests some additional functionality
> may be needed around kunit resources.  It seems to require
>
> 1. support for resources without allocation
> 2. support for lookup of such resources
> 3. support for access to resources across multiple kernel threads
>
> The proposed changes here are designed to address these needs.
> The idea is we first generalize the API to support adding
> resources with static data; then from there we support named
> resources.  The latter support is needed because if we are
> in a different thread context and only have the "struct kunit *"
> to work with, we need a way to identify a resource in lookup.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286
>
> Changes since v3:
> - removed unused "init" field from "struct kunit_resources" (Brendan)

Shuah, it looks like you haven't sent a PR to Linus yet. Would you
mind picking this up for 5.8?