[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1591392867.4615.20.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 17:34:27 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IMA: Add log statements for failure conditions
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 14:09 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 6/5/20 1:49 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> >
> >> Since a pr_xyz() call was already present, I just wanted to change the
> >> log level to keep the code change to the minimum. But if audit log is
> >> the right approach for this case, I'll update.
> >
> > Generally we reserve audit for things that are required for various
> > security certifications and/or "security relevant". From what you
> > mentioned above, it seems like this would fall into the second
> > category if not the first.
> >
> > Looking at your patch it doesn't look like you are trying to record
> > anything special so you may be able to use the existing
> > integrity_audit_msg(...) helper. Of course then the question comes
> > down to the audit record type (the audit_msgno argument), the
> > operation (op), and the comm/cause (cause).
> >
> > Do you feel that any of the existing audit record types are a good fit for this?
> >
>
> Maybe I can use the audit_msgno "AUDIT_INTEGRITY_PCR" with appropriate
> strings for "op" and "cause".
>
> Mimi - please let me know if you think this audit_msgno would be ok to
> use. I see this code used, for instance, for boot aggregate measurement.
>
> integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_PCR, NULL, boot_aggregate_name, op,
> audit_cause, result, 0);
Yes, AUDIT_INTEGRITY_PCR is also used for failures to add to the
measurement list.
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists