[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c21c6ffa19b6483ea57feab3f98f279c@baidu.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 04:23:36 +0000
From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To: "like.xu@...el.com" <like.xu@...el.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"sean.j.christopherson@...el.com" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"xiaoyao.li@...el.com" <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
"wei.huang2@....com" <wei.huang2@....com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH][v6] KVM: X86: support APERF/MPERF registers
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Xu, Like [mailto:like.xu@...el.com]
> 发送时间: 2020年6月5日 10:32
> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> 抄送: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org;
> hpa@...or.com; bp@...en8.de; mingo@...hat.com; tglx@...utronix.de;
> jmattson@...gle.com; wanpengli@...cent.com; vkuznets@...hat.com;
> sean.j.christopherson@...el.com; pbonzini@...hat.com; xiaoyao.li@...el.com;
> wei.huang2@....com
> 主题: Re: [PATCH][v6] KVM: X86: support APERF/MPERF registers
>
> Hi RongQing,
>
> On 2020/6/5 9:44, Li RongQing wrote:
> > Guest kernel reports a fixed cpu frequency in /proc/cpuinfo, this is
> > confused to user when turbo is enable, and aperf/mperf can be used to
> > show current cpu frequency after 7d5905dc14a
> > "(x86 / CPU: Always show current CPU frequency in /proc/cpuinfo)"
> > so guest should support aperf/mperf capability
> >
> > This patch implements aperf/mperf by three mode: none, software
> > emulation, and pass-through
> >
> > None: default mode, guest does not support aperf/mperf
> s/None/Note
> >
> > Software emulation: the period of aperf/mperf in guest mode are
> > accumulated as emulated value
> >
> > Pass-though: it is only suitable for KVM_HINTS_REALTIME, Because that
> > hint guarantees we have a 1:1 vCPU:CPU binding and guaranteed no
> > over-commit.
> The flag "KVM_HINTS_REALTIME 0" (in the Documentation/virt/kvm/cpuid.rst)
> is claimed as "guest checks this feature bit to determine that vCPUs are never
> preempted for an unlimited time allowing optimizations".
>
> I couldn't see its relationship with "1:1 vCPU: pCPU binding".
> The patch doesn't check this flag as well for your pass-through purpose.
>
> Thanks,
> Like Xu
I think this is user space jobs to bind HINT_REALTIME and mperf passthrough, KVM just do what userspace wants.
and this gives user space a possibility, guest has passthrough mperfaperf without HINT_REALTIME, guest can get coarse cpu frequency without performance effect if guest can endure error frequency occasionally
-Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists