linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 12/80] pppoe: only process PADT targeted at local interfaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Jun 2020 21:12:54 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     David Balažic <xerces9@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 12/80] pppoe: only process PADT targeted at local
 interfaces

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:31:31AM +0200, David Balažic wrote:
>On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 22:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman
><gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 08:39:00PM +0200, David Balažic wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Is there a good reason this did not land in 4.14 branch?
>> >
>> > Openwrt is using that and so it missed this patch.
>> >
>> > Any chance it goes in in next round?
>>
>> Does it apply and build cleanly?
>>
>> I don't know why I didn't backport it further, something must have
>> broke...
>
>The patch from the above applies to linux-4.14.183
>
>If I apply it manually (open pppoe.c in editor and add the two lines
>from the patch) then it builds.
>Until LD      vmlinux.o when I run out of disk space...
>I applied it by editor because the first time something went wrong
>when copying the patch from the email and it did not apply.
>
>So it looks OK, but someone else should try it too.
>My build system is not exactly great.. (it is a VM I created for
>openwrt builds and it is after midnight and I don't feel like
>extending the virtual disk.. sorry, maybe tomorrow).

Hm, indeed it looks ok for 4.14 (and 4.9, 4.4) so I've queued it up,
thank you.

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha