linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: function: printer: Fix use-after-free in __lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:14:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: function: printer: Fix use-after-free in
 __lock_acquire()

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:57:55AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Fix this by increase object reference count.
> 
> I find this description incomplete according to the proposed changes.
> 
> Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You seem to
have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch
submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list.

I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not bother
developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with
comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore this suggestion, it is not needed to be
followed at all, as the person/bot/AI that sent it is on almost all
Linux kernel maintainer's blacklists and is ignored by them.  Please
feel free to also do the same.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot