[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605091449.GA2321638@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:14:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Zhang Qiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: function: printer: Fix use-after-free in
__lock_acquire()
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 10:57:55AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Fix this by increase object reference count.
>
> I find this description incomplete according to the proposed changes.
>
> Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You seem to
have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch
submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list.
I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother
developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with
comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore this suggestion, it is not needed to be
followed at all, as the person/bot/AI that sent it is on almost all
Linux kernel maintainer's blacklists and is ignored by them. Please
feel free to also do the same.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists