linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200605091827.GD19286@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:18:27 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ipsec-next tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 06:44:10AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/4/20 12:41 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 08:55:01PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> >> On 6/3/20 7:26 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>
> >>> And now the net-next tree has been merged into Linus' tree without this fix :-(
> >>>
> >>
> >> I took a look earlier and I think it is fine. Some code was moved around
> >> in ipsec-next and I think the merge is good. I'll run the test cases
> >> later this week and double check. Thanks for the reminder
> > 
> > The setting of XFRM_TRANSFORMED moved to xfrm_output() and depends
> > on CONFIG_NETFILTER. So I think the fix is needed. After the merge
> > of the net tree today, I have both conflicting patches patches in
> > the ipsec tree. I'd apply the fix from Stephen unless you say
> > it is not needed.
> > 
> 
> Indeed. I must have been looking at -net. Both -net and -net-next have
> it conditional, so yes a fixup patch is needed.

The fixup patch from Stephen is now applied to the ipsec tree.