| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 17:27:02 +0800
From: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@...fujitsu.com>
To: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
CC: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@...e.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP: syscalls: regression on mainline - ioctl_loop01
mknod07 setns01
Hi Martign
Also for your kernel commit,
lo->lo_flags |= prev_lo_flags & ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS;
lo->lo_flags |= prev_lo_flags & ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS;
since ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS has been included in
~LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS, do we still need the previous step?
What do you think about it?
Best Regards
Yang Xu
> Hey Yang,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 10:59 AM Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martijn
>>
>> Sorry for noise. I see your patch in here[1] . I will modify
>> ioctl_loop01 to test that LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN can not clear and
>> LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR can be clear.
>
> Thanks, that would indeed be useful.
>
>>
>> ps: Giving the url of patch is better so that other people doesn't need
>> to investigate it again.
>> [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11588321/
>
> Ok, will do next time!
>
> Best,
> Martijn
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Yang Xu
>>> Hi Martijn
>>>
>>>> Hi Naresh,
>>>>
>>>> I just sent a patch and cc'd you. I verified all the loop tests pass
>>>> again with that patch.
>>> I think you want to say "without". I verified the ioctl_loop01 fails
>>> with faf1d25440 ("loop: Clean up LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling").
>>>
>>> This kernel commit breaks old behaviour(if old flag all 0, new flag is
>>> always 0 regradless your flag setting).
>>>
>>> I think we should modify code as below:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
>>> index 13518ba191f5..c6ba8cf486ce 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
>>> @@ -1364,11 +1364,9 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const
>>> struct loop_info64 *info)
>>> if (err)
>>> goto out_unfreeze;
>>>
>>> - /* Mask out flags that can't be set using LOOP_SET_STATUS. */
>>> - lo->lo_flags &= ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS;
>>> - /* For those flags, use the previous values instead */
>>> - lo->lo_flags |= prev_lo_flags & ~LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS;
>>> - /* For flags that can't be cleared, use previous values too */
>>> + /* Mask out flags that can be set using LOOP_SET_STATUS. */
>>> + lo->lo_flags &= LOOP_SET_STATUS_SETTABLE_FLAGS;
>>> + /* For flags that can't be cleared, use previous values. */
>>> lo->lo_flags |= prev_lo_flags &~LOOP_SET_STATUS_CLEARABLE_FLAGS;
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Yang Xu
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:10 PM Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Naresh,
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect the loop failures are due to
>>>>> faf1d25440d6ad06d509dada4b6fe62fea844370 ("loop: Clean up
>>>>> LOOP_SET_STATUS lo_flags handling"), I will investigate and get back
>>>>> to you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 7:19 PM Naresh Kamboju
>>>>> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + linux-block@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 22:47, Naresh Kamboju
>>>>>> <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Following three test cases reported as regression on Linux mainline
>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>> on x86_64, arm64, arm and i386
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ltp-syscalls-tests:
>>>>>>> * ioctl_loop01
>>>>>>> * mknod07
>>>>>>> * setns01
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> git repo:
>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>>>>>> git branch: master
>>>>>>> GOOD:
>>>>>>> git commit: b23c4771ff62de8ca9b5e4a2d64491b2fb6f8f69
>>>>>>> git describe: v5.7-1230-gb23c4771ff62
>>>>>>> BAD:
>>>>>>> git commit: 1ee08de1e234d95b5b4f866878b72fceb5372904
>>>>>>> git describe: v5.7-3523-g1ee08de1e234
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kernel-config:
>>>>>>> https://builds.tuxbuild.com/U3bU0dMA62OVHb4DvZIVuw/kernel.config
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are investigating these failures.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tst_test.c:906: CONF: btrfs driver not available
>>>>>>> tst_test.c:1246: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 15m 00s
>>>>>>> tst_device.c:88: INFO: Found free device 1 '/dev/loop1'
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:49: PASS: /sys/block/loop1/loop/partscan = 0
>>>>>>> [ 1073.639677] loop_set_status: loop1 () has still dirty pages
>>>>>>> (nrpages=1)
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:50: PASS: /sys/block/loop1/loop/autoclear = 0
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:51: PASS: /sys/block/loop1/loop/backing_file =
>>>>>>> '/scratch/ltp-mnIdulzriQ/9cPtLQ/test.img'
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:63: FAIL: expect 12 but got 17
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:67: FAIL: /sys/block/loop1/loop/partscan != 1 got 0
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:68: FAIL: /sys/block/loop1/loop/autoclear != 1 got 0
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:79: FAIL: access /dev/loop1p1 fails
>>>>>>> [ 1073.679678] loop_set_status: loop1 () has still dirty pages
>>>>>>> (nrpages=1)
>>>>>>> ioctl_loop01.c:85: FAIL: access /sys/block/loop1/loop1p1 fails
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes, see:
>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=10c70d95c0f2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mke2fs 1.43.8 (1-Jan-2018)
>>>>>>> [ 1264.711379] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounting ext2 file system using the
>>>>>>> ext4 subsystem
>>>>>>> [ 1264.716642] EXT4-fs (loop0): mounted filesystem without journal.
>>>>>>> Opts: (null)
>>>>>>> mknod07 0 TINFO : Using test device LTP_DEV='/dev/loop0'
>>>>>>> mknod07 0 TINFO : Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts=''
>>>>>>> extra opts=''
>>>>>>> mknod07 1 TPASS : mknod failed as expected:
>>>>>>> TEST_ERRNO=EACCES(13): Permission denied
>>>>>>> mknod07 2 TPASS : mknod failed as expected:
>>>>>>> TEST_ERRNO=EACCES(13): Permission denied
>>>>>>> mknod07 3 TFAIL : mknod07.c:155: mknod succeeded unexpectedly
>>>>>>> mknod07 4 TPASS : mknod failed as expected:
>>>>>>> TEST_ERRNO=EPERM(1): Operation not permitted
>>>>>>> mknod07 5 TPASS : mknod failed as expected:
>>>>>>> TEST_ERRNO=EROFS(30): Read-only file system
>>>>>>> mknod07 6 TPASS : mknod failed as expected:
>>>>>>> TEST_ERRNO=ELOOP(40): Too many levels of symbolic links
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=ipc, ns_fds[0]=6,
>>>>>>> ns_types[0]=0x8000000
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=mnt, ns_fds[1]=7, ns_types[1]=0x20000
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=net, ns_fds[2]=8,
>>>>>>> ns_types[2]=0x40000000
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=pid, ns_fds[3]=9,
>>>>>>> ns_types[3]=0x20000000
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : ns_name=uts, ns_fds[4]=10,
>>>>>>> ns_types[4]=0x4000000
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x8000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 1 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x20000)
>>>>>>> setns01 2 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x40000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 3 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x20000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 4 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(-1, 0x4000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 5 TPASS : invalid fd exp_errno=9
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x8000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 6 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22:
>>>>>>> errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x20000)
>>>>>>> setns01 7 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22:
>>>>>>> errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x40000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 8 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22:
>>>>>>> errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x20000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 9 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22:
>>>>>>> errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor
>>>>>>> setns01 0 TINFO : setns(11, 0x4000000)
>>>>>>> setns01 10 TFAIL : setns01.c:176: regular file fd exp_errno=22:
>>>>>>> errno=EBADF(9): Bad file descriptor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Full test log link,
>>>>>>> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/1467931#L8047
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> test results comparison shows this test case started failing from
>>>>>>> June-2-2020
>>>>>>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v5.7-4092-g38696e33e2bd/testrun/2779586/suite/ltp-syscalls-tests/test/ioctl_loop01/history/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v5.7-4092-g38696e33e2bd/testrun/2779586/suite/ltp-syscalls-tests/test/setns01/history/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-oe/build/v5.7-4092-g38696e33e2bd/testrun/2779586/suite/ltp-syscalls-tests/test/mknod07/history/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Linaro LKFT
>>>>>>> https://lkft.linaro.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists