lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 04:10:49 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hulkci@...wei.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get() On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:56:45PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > A lot of maintainers have blocked Markus and asked him to stop trying > > to help people write commit message. > > I am trying to contribute a bit of patch review as usual. Please stop criticising people's commit messages. Your suggestions are usually not improvements. > > Saying "bdev" instead of "block device" is more clear > > I find this view interesting. Dan is right. > > so your original message was better. > > Does this feedback include reported spelling mistakes? You can keep doing that. But refcount -> reference count is not particularly interesting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists