[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605111049.GA19604@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 04:10:49 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hulkci@...wei.com,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: Fix use-after-free in blkdev_get()
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 12:56:45PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > A lot of maintainers have blocked Markus and asked him to stop trying
> > to help people write commit message.
>
> I am trying to contribute a bit of patch review as usual.
Please stop criticising people's commit messages. Your suggestions
are usually not improvements.
> > Saying "bdev" instead of "block device" is more clear
>
> I find this view interesting.
Dan is right.
> > so your original message was better.
>
> Does this feedback include reported spelling mistakes?
You can keep doing that. But refcount -> reference count is not
particularly interesting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists