[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59531654-a1fd-09cf-bb33-ae3fe5363298@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 14:52:32 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chao Hao <chao.hao@...iatek.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/mediatek: Use totalram_pages to setup enable_4GB
On 04.06.20 17:27, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 04.06.20 17:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 01:32:40PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Just a thought: If memory hotplug is applicable as well, you might
>>> either want to always assume data->enable_4GB, or handle memory hotplug
>>> events from the memory notifier, when new memory gets onlined (not sure
>>> how tricky that is).
>>
>> We probably want a highest_pfn_possible() or similar API instead of
>> having drivers poking into random VM internals.
>
> Well, memory notifiers are a reasonable api used accross the kernel to
> get notified when new memory is onlined to the buddy that could be used
> for allocations.
>
> highest_pfn_possible() would have to default to something linked to
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS whenever memory hotplug is configured, I am not sure
> how helpful that is (IOW, you can just default to enable_4GB=true in
> that case instead in most cases).
Correction: At least on x86-64 we have max_possible_pfn, which will
consult the ACPI SRAT table to figure out the maximum possible PFN.
(Without SRAT, max_possible_pfn will point at the end of initial boot
memory and not consider hotplug memory - something that e.g., newer QEMU
versions work around by creating SRAT tables if memory hotplug might be
possible, even if there is no actual NUMA configuration).
pci-swiotlb.c similarly relies on that to figure out if there are any
!DMA addresses to handle.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists