[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605000439.v75kbagqcxvctqam@treble>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 19:04:39 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:37:15AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/module.c: In function 'do_init_module':
> kernel/module.c:3593:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_enable_ro'; did you mean 'module_enable_x'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 3593 | module_enable_ro(mod, true);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | module_enable_x
>
> Caused by commit
>
> e6eff4376e28 ("module: Make module_enable_ro() static again")
>
> This config has neither CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX or
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX set. This failure was hidden in
> linux-next due to commit
>
> db991af02f11 ("module: break nested ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX and STRICT_MODULE_RWX #ifdefs")
>
> from the modules tree. I have cherry-picked that commit for today.
Sorry, I guessed we missed that dependency between the live-patching and
module trees.
Jessica, are you planning on sending a pull request?
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists