[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605140521.GD4117@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:05:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
Yuqi Jin <jinyuqi@...wei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Jiong Wang <jiongwang@...wei.com>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [net] a6211caa63:
dmesg.UBSAN:signed-integer-overflow_in_arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:17:51AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:10 AM kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> wrote:
> There you go.
>
> We decided this was a bogus report, and that UBSAN requires sane compilers.
>
> Please read the fine comment that was added in this commit and update
> your compiler or do not mess with compiler flags.
>
> + /* If UBSAN reports an error there, please make sure your compiler
> + * supports -fno-strict-overflow before reporting it that was a bug
> + * in UBSAN, and it has been fixed in GCC-8.
> + */
> + return atomic_add_return(segs + delta, p_id) - segs;
> > make HOSTCC=gcc-4.9 CC=gcc-4.9 ARCH=i386 olddefconfig prepare modules_prepare bzImage
Rong, can you make sure to exclude gcc<8 for UBSAN reports ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists