[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200605181700.GB561977@carbon.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:17:00 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/19] mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches
for all allocations
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:24:33PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 5/28/20 12:34 AM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> > index c49a863adb63..57b425d623e5 100644
> > --- a/mm/slab.h
> > +++ b/mm/slab.h
> ...
> > @@ -526,8 +430,7 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *cache_from_obj(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)
> > * When kmemcg is not being used, both assignments should return the
> > * same value. but we don't want to pay the assignment price in that
> > * case. If it is not compiled in, the compiler should be smart enough
> > - * to not do even the assignment. In that case, slab_equal_or_root
> > - * will also be a constant.
> > + * to not do even the assignment.
> > */
> > if (!memcg_kmem_enabled() &&
>
> Just realized that this test can go away - we don't have to call virt_to_cache()
> due to kmemcg if there is just a single cache.
Good point, will remove it in v6.
Thanks!
>
> > !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED) &&
> > @@ -535,7 +438,7 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *cache_from_obj(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x)
> > return s;
> >
> > cachep = virt_to_cache(x);
> > - WARN_ONCE(cachep && !slab_equal_or_root(cachep, s),
> > + WARN_ONCE(cachep && cachep != s,
> > "%s: Wrong slab cache. %s but object is from %s\n",
> > __func__, s->name, cachep->name);
> > return cachep;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists