linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for possible misuse of IS_ENABLED() without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202006051148.DA853DA@keescook>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:48:10 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for possible misuse of IS_ENABLED()
 without CONFIG_

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> IS_ENABLED is almost always used with CONFIG_<FOO> defines.
> 
> Add a test to verify that the #define being tested starts with CONFIG_.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook