linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: batch cancel in io_uring_cancel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun,  7 Jun 2020 18:32:25 +0300
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] io_uring: batch cancel in io_uring_cancel_files()

Instead of waiting for each request one by one, first try to cancel all
of them in a batched manner, and then go over inflight_list/etc to reap
leftovers.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index bcfb3b14b888..3aebbf96c123 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -7519,9 +7519,22 @@ static int io_uring_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool io_wq_files_match(struct io_wq_work *work, void *data)
+{
+	struct files_struct *files = data;
+
+	return work->files == files;
+}
+
 static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 				  struct files_struct *files)
 {
+	if (list_empty_careful(&ctx->inflight_list))
+		return;
+
+	/* cancel all at once, should be faster than doing it one by one*/
+	io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_wq_files_match, files, true);
+
 	while (!list_empty_careful(&ctx->inflight_list)) {
 		struct io_kiocb *cancel_req = NULL, *req;
 		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-- 
2.24.0