[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608082150.GB1542@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:21:51 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Possible PATCH]arm64: ftrace: Change CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 12:25:50PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS does not exist as a Kconfig symbol.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
>
> I don't have the hardware, so I can't tell if this is a
> correct change, but it is a logical one.
>
> Found by a test script that looks for IS_ENABLED(FOO)
> where FOO must also exist in Kconfig files.
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> index 8618faa82e6d..86a5cf9bc19a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ static struct plt_entry *get_ftrace_plt(struct module *mod, unsigned long addr)
>
> if (addr == FTRACE_ADDR)
> return &plt[FTRACE_PLT_IDX];
> - if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
> + if (addr == FTRACE_REGS_ADDR &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
> return &plt[FTRACE_REGS_PLT_IDX];
Ha! So much for 100-char lines ;)
(fix looks good to me, I'll queue it for -rc1)
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists